Open n3ziniuka5 opened 6 years ago
I vote for SBT 1.x.
@virtualirfan @chandu0101:
Migrating sbt-sri-platform
requires review of several other projects:
Update sbt-sri-platform
, mobile.g8
and other projects:
version.sbt
and review interdependencies (from the light of sbt-dynver
)cross compile 2.10, 2.11, 2.12
why 2.10, 2.11 ? , let force community to move forward .. , i'll vote 2.13 cross compile
provide version.sbt and review interdependencies (from the light of sbt-dynver
sbt-dynver is needed , it fetches version number from git tag in travis builds...
@chandu0101 : I've cross compiled scalajs-jest/core
and scalajs-plus/core
on 2.11 and 2.12 already. Apparently it is OK but I'm not skilled enough on jest to tell for sure. I will cross compile to 2.13 as soon as dependencies are satisfied.
Yes, sbt-dynver
is the way to go. However, at this point, it's easier for me to hardcode the version. After everything works as designed, I will focus only on making things fit well with tags and sbt-dynver
.
The lack of sbt 1.x support means you cannot use this in a multi-project build, unless the whole project is on older sbt.