Open oker1 opened 6 years ago
Hey Zsolt,
Thanks for the issue. I agree that the case study needs some work.
@noelwelsh has a bunch of changes incoming that will hopefully address the problems!
Cheers, Dave
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:58 AM Zsolt Takács notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is worth a clarification, but I've had a bit of head scratching with this one.
If you create the BoundedSemiLattice[Int] instance in a worksheet outside the BoundedSemiLattice companion object, it'll get picked up as Monoid[Int] by the increment method. The increment method will not work properly. While I really liked this excercise, it can be a bit confusing since it requires a Monoid[Int] with the add behavior for increment and it requires a BoundedSemiLattice[Int] (which happens to be also a Monoid[Int]) with the max behavior for the merge operation.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/underscoreio/advanced-scala/issues/100, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOI5_rpecgIamZly2V6XQvf-Nak435wks5s9SHlgaJpZM4Q2Gkd .
Hi everyone.
Any idea if we can change the signatures such that the BoundedSemiLattice
instance for Int
is picked up for merge
and the Monoid
instance for increment
and total
?
I'm not sure if this is worth a clarification, but I've had a bit of head scratching with this one.
If you create the BoundedSemiLattice[Int] instance in a worksheet outside the BoundedSemiLattice companion object, it'll get picked up as Monoid[Int] by the increment method. The increment method will not work properly. While I really liked this excercise, it can be a bit confusing since it requires a Monoid[Int] with the add behavior for increment and it requires a BoundedSemiLattice[Int] (which happens to be also a Monoid[Int]) with the max behavior for the merge operation.