Closed Kerkesni closed 3 weeks ago
My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help
to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.
Status report is not available.
The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:
the author
2 peers
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 70.40%. Comparing base (
6694ca8
) to head (bb69b62
). Report is 29 commits behind head on development/8.7.
/approve
The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.
The changeset will be merged in:
development/8.7
The following branches will NOT be impacted:
development/7.10
development/7.4
development/7.70
development/8.5
development/8.6
There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will contact you to help resolve the matter.
IMPORTANT
Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.
If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a member of the admin team now.
The following options are set: approve
I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request into targetted development branches:
development/8.7
The following branches have NOT changed:
development/7.10
development/7.4
development/7.70
development/8.5
development/8.6
Please check the status of the associated issue BB-623.
Goodbye kerkesni.
validate()
doesn't seem to validate the config at all, replaced it withjoi.attempt()
that we use to validate the extension configs.undefined
is now returned by the startup function when no probeserver config is provided. This case is already supported in the entrypoint files.Issue: BB-623