I have a 1:M connection between type User (1) (field: invitations) and type Invitation (many) (field: sender)
If I:
edit the sender field on Invitation, and
rename the remote reverse field name from there (i.e., from invitations to invitationsSent),
the User type now has fields for both invitations and invitationsSent
looks like a bug, though it's easy enough to work around since these types don't have any records yet
note that deleting invitations from User in this instance resulted in the Invitation field sender being deleted, so invitationsSent remains as an orphan connection field
I have a 1:M connection between type
User
(1) (field:invitations
) and typeInvitation
(many) (field:sender
)If I:
edit the
sender
field onInvitation
, andrename the remote reverse field name from there (i.e., from
invitations
toinvitationsSent
),the
User
type now has fields for bothinvitations
andinvitationsSent
looks like a bug, though it's easy enough to work around since these types don't have any records yet
note that deleting
invitations
fromUser
in this instance resulted in theInvitation
fieldsender
being deleted, soinvitationsSent
remains as an orphan connection field