Open shehongbing opened 1 year ago
I agree it is not a great fit. I think it is getting confused by the relatively high rate of error. Have you used DeepConsensus on the reads? That often cleans up the data nicely
Good luck! Mike
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:03 AM shehongbing @.***> wrote:
hi, there, I performed genome survey using HiFi reads. And my command as follows:
kmc -k27 -m24 -cs10000 pigweed.HiFi.fq.gz pigweed ./ kmc_tools transform pigweed histogram pigweed.histo -cx10000
The results as follows:
http://qb.cshl.edu/genomescope/genomescope2.0/analysis.php?code=ffiaSWwLPRS0FLXEUp1D
I was puzzled about the high heterozygosity (7.34%), but almost one peak is found. Would you mind give me some suggestions.
thx hongbing
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/schatzlab/genomescope/issues/109, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABP343ZXYHOYZUOPCVSRA3XY26ELANCNFSM6AAAAAA4LHLJ3M . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
hi, there, I performed genome survey using HiFi reads. And my command as follows:
kmc -k27 -m24 -cs10000 pigweed.HiFi.fq.gz pigweed ./ kmc_tools transform pigweed histogram pigweed.histo -cx10000
The results as follows: http://qb.cshl.edu/genomescope/genomescope2.0/analysis.php?code=ffiaSWwLPRS0FLXEUp1D
I was puzzled about the high heterozygosity (7.34%), but almost one peak is found. Would you mind give me some suggestions.
thx hongbing