currently every single topography analytic operation that can be performed is called a “process,” including the generation of simulated mosaics. This has turned out to make a number of things more repetitive and complicated than they need to be when operations need to be repeated for and/or inclusive of simulated mosaic data. Splitting the architecture to ‘point data’ and ‘processes’, where ‘point data’ includes ‘real’ and ‘simulated’ (subfields: ‘total’ and ‘sub’), then applying all specified processes on all specified point data, will resolve this I think. Needs more thought.
currently every single topography analytic operation that can be performed is called a “process,” including the generation of simulated mosaics. This has turned out to make a number of things more repetitive and complicated than they need to be when operations need to be repeated for and/or inclusive of simulated mosaic data. Splitting the architecture to ‘point data’ and ‘processes’, where ‘point data’ includes ‘real’ and ‘simulated’ (subfields: ‘total’ and ‘sub’), then applying all specified processes on all specified point data, will resolve this I think. Needs more thought.