Open DanielHeath opened 6 years ago
This is a good idea. I think it could be useful to do something like this in the next iteration? I don't know if the logic in the current version is general enough to be compatible.
Having thought about this a bit more, I think each page could have a 'default action' (stored with the page) rather than a page type. That would also make it easier to support #122
Currently, all pages are just plain markdown, but they can be (eg) published, have meta-info, etc.
They can also be shown as a list, and there's open proposals to add other rendering styles (eg workflowy-style) and non-text file types (file uploads).
With that in mind, would it make sense to have a set of page types: