Closed luciusbono closed 3 years ago
@luciusbono this is absolutely amazing! thank you so much.
it seems to work perfectly, except for the line in 1+2 - its not recording when armed. i think the reason is that params:get("input type")==(1 or 4)
for some reason is not hte same as params:get("input type")==1 or params:get("input type")==4
. i checked this by adding these print statements when line 1+2 was enabled:
print(params:get("input type")==(1 or 4))
print(params:get("input type")==1 or params:get("input type")==4)
which prints
false
true
could you change those to the longer or-statements? also, i think instead of "line-in 1
" you might just do line-in L
since it is controlling the left input.
You're totally right, not only was that if-logic broken but I noticed that copied a few not
operators that meant that the script was likely not flipping into the faster polling rates in some circumstances. Also also switched input labels, I agree that L/R makes more sense.
look awesome! thank you :) :) :)
Adds the following features:
line-in L
orline-in R
independently as a global option alongside existingtape
only mode andline-in (L+R) + tape
modesline-in + tape
toline-in (L+R) + tape
for added clarity