search

school-CS2103T / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

DG Incorrect Wording #12

Open guowei42 opened 1 year ago

guowei42 commented 1 year ago

AddItem is still considered [Proposed] even though it is fully implemented in the application.

soc-pe-bot commented 1 year ago

Team's Response

Thanks, should have made the necessary changes

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

DG not updated to remove the [Proposed] tag from AddItem command

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

AddItem feature is shown as [Proposed] in the DG, but is already implemented in the application, and showcased in the UG.

The DG should be updated to reflect what feature has already been added, to avoid confusing future developers who might waste time to implement said feature.

Screenshot 2022-11-11 at 5.26.50 PM.png

[original: nus-cs2103-AY2223S1/pe-interim#3699] [original labels: severity.Medium type.DocumentationBug]

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Response

  • It will not impede the developer from viewing the guide. Just a minor inconvenience.

    Items for the Tester to Verify

    :question: Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low] Originally [severity.VeryLow]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]