Closed FilipeMatteoli closed 4 years ago
Hi! Sorry, I didn't get a notification for this message in my e-mail.. and I'm not as good as I should be about checking github notifications..
This is a very good question. I overlooked adding the option to change the distance method. I have it written to use the Bray-Curtis distance, I definitely should have at least wrote that in the vignette, but I did not, so thank you for pointing this out. I will add an argument to change the distance method for these functions this week!
Thanks so much!
@FilipeMatteoli I just pushed an updated version with a 'method' argument for each of them. By default it uses Bray-Curtis distance ('bray'), but can now take any of “euclidian”, “manhattan”, “canberra”, “bray”, “kulczynski”, “gower”, “morisita”, “horn”, “mountford”, “jaccard”, “raup”, “binomial”, “chao”, “altGower”, “cao”, “mahalanobis”, “clark”
Please let me know if there is any other feedback on this!
Hello @schuyler-smith great news I will try it soon! I always enjoy testing how different metrics affect the clustering as this can reveal hidden patterns. Thanks for this.
Hello, thanks for the package. I am struggling trying to find out which distance the package is using in clustering analysis? Usually, we need to specify the distance, but phylosmith has no option for this, so what is being calculated under the hood?