Create advanced search page and function with AND, OR, excluded and Exact Text modifiers

[crisr15]

Story

Create advanced search page and function with AND, OR, excluded and Exact Text modifiers. Pals would like to use the blacklight advanced search gem and have a similar experience to Adventist Digital Library (https://adl.b2.adventistdigitallibrary.org/advanced) . Please add and map all the metadata fields, but they do not want any of the 'additional attributes'. Metadata for hyku commons.

Acceptance Criteria

• [ ] Search shows an advanced button so users can get to advanced search
• [ ] Advanced search contains all the available metadata fields.
• [ ] Advanced search is functioning and the modifiers work.
• [ ] The advanced search button is included in the toolbar in all 3 themes

fields

• [ ] Title
• [ ] Creator
• [ ] Keyword
• [ ] Rights Statement or Rights
• [ ] Resource Type or Type
• [ ] License
• [ ] Alternative Title
• [ ] Contributor
• [ ] Description
• [ ] Abstract
• [ ] Access Rights or Additional Rights Information
• [ ] Rights notes
• [ ] Publisher
• [ ] Date Created or Date
• [ ] Subject
• [ ] Language
• [ ] Identifier
• [ ] Related URL
• [ ] Source
• [ ] Bibliographic Citation
• [ ] Extent
• [ ] Audience
• [ ] Education Level
• [ ] Learning Resource Type
• [ ] Discipline
• [ ] Rights Holder
• [ ] Size
• [ ] Table Of Contents
• [ ] Accessibility Feature
• [ ] Accessibility Hazard
• [ ] Accessibility Summary
• [ ] Degree
• [ ] Level
• [ ] Grantor
• [ ] Format
• [ ] Advisor
• [ ] Committee member
• [ ] Department

Screenshots / Video

https://adl.b2.adventistdigitallibrary.org/advanced

Testing Instructions and Sample Files

-

Notes

Are there any fields you want people to be able to search separately? Advanced search gem may be going away in the future to be replaces by something else. When hyku gets to a later version of blacklight we will need to adjust/upgrade this feature.

[ndroark]

We do want to be able to search fields separately. CDM uses a system where every field is isolatable in a dropdown (https://dmr.bsu.edu/digital/search/advanced). We can be ready to discuss this more on Monday.

[DiemBTran]

List of all metadata fields:

• [x] Title
• [x] Creator
• [x] Keyword
• [x] Rights Statement
  • as it appears on Generic Work, Image, and OER new work form
• [ ] Rights
  • as it appears on ETD new work form
• [x] Resource Type
  • as it appears on Generic Work and Image new work form
• [ ] Type
  • as it appears on OER and ETD new work form
• [x] License
• [ ] Administrative Notes
  • this is an admin-only field. should we skip this one?
• [ ] Alternative Title
• [x] Contributor
• [ ] Description
• [x] Abstract
• [ ] Access Rights
• [ ] Rights notes
• [x] Publisher
• [x] Date Created
  • as it appears on Generic Work, Image, and OER new work form
• [ ] Date
  • as it appears on ETD new work form
• [x] Subject
• [x] Language
• [ ] Identifier
• [ ] Related URL
• [ ] Source
• [ ] Additional Rights Information
• [ ] Bibliographic Citation
• [x] Extent
• [ ] Audience
• [ ] Education Level
• [ ] Learning Resource Type
• [ ] Discipline
• [ ] Rights Holder
• [ ] Size
• [ ] Table Of Contents
• [ ] Accessibility Feature
• [ ] Accessibility Hazard
• [ ] Accessibility Summary
• [ ] Degree
• [ ] Level
• [ ] Grantor
• [ ] Format
• [ ] Advisor
• [ ] Committee member
• [ ] Department
• note: Location is currently included in Advanced Search, but it's not a metadata field for any Work Type in Pals
  • screenshot of advanced search
  • screenshots for generic work, image, oer, etd new work forms

[summer-cook]

Several of these fields are actually the same thing, they are just labeled differently on the form depending on the worktype. I am not able to add duplicates of the search_fields so that they will each get their own field on advanced search, so in these cases I have to combine them into one field with their labels.

• Rights
  • this is actually just labeled differently for etds - its actually the exact same thing as rights statement, so i combined them
• Type
  • this is also actually the same field as resource type, just labeled differently for OER & ETD
• Date
  • same field as date created
• Additional Rights Information
  • as far as i can tell this is the same thing as access rights for all work types (it maps to access rights), a property of access rights doesn't actually map anywhere? I included it though just in case

Skipping

• administrative notes as it is admin only
• identifier: specifically has code to remove it from search fields?

[labradford]

Advanced search is not showing up on Cultural Repository or Institutional Repository home page themes

[DiemBTran]

This passes SoftServ QA: See attached screenshots and recording.

acceptance criteria:

• [x] Search shows an advanced button so users can get to advanced search
• [x] Advanced search contains all the available metadata fields.
• [x] Advanced search is functioning and the modifiers work.
• [x] The advanced search button is included in the toolbar in all 3 themes

Advanced Search is in all themes and includes all metadata fields

    https://github.com/scientist-softserv/palni-palci/assets/29311858/0a8a84bd-9477-4d87-ae4b-809f98933ee9

[ndroark]

I am already seeing this in production (and it appears to work as intended). Does this need to be moved to Client QA or to deploy?

[summer-cook]

@ndroark I think there are some things that still need to be deployed, so ill move it into deploy to prod if you see it working as intended.