Closed catanzaromj closed 3 years ago
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
master@05af7cd
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is90.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 86.92%
=========================================
Files ? 6
Lines ? 153
Branches ? 13
=========================================
Hits ? 133
Misses ? 15
Partials ? 5
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
tadasets/shapes.py | 69.69% <90.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 05af7cd...c29678c. Read the comment docs.
This is great, thank you! It looks like the travis tests are a bit backed up, maybe travis is having some availability issues? Once they are done I see no reason not to merge this.
Yup, this is great. I didn't realize we didn't already incorporate seeds, so thanks for noticing that!
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 1:23 PM Nathaniel Saul notifications@github.com wrote:
This is great, thank you! It looks like the travis tests are a bit backed up, maybe travis is having some availability issues? Once they are done I see no reason not to merge this.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/scikit-tda/tadasets/pull/7#issuecomment-725584251, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJWDZR3AEYXIS6UUNFQTADSPLI77ANCNFSM4TSH5COA .
Raised in https://github.com/scikit-tda/tadasets/issues/5, this adds a random seed parameter to the shape constructors. This change is easy enough to implement in the other methods of the package if desired. I found setting the random seed to be especially useful for benchmarking my own code and thought others might benefit from it as well.