issues
search
scionassociation
/
scion-dp_I-D
Specification of the SCION data plane
https://scionassociation.github.io/scion-dp_I-D/
Other
2
stars
0
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
dummy change
#83
nicorusti
closed
2 weeks ago
0
Final tweaks
#82
knmeynell
closed
2 weeks ago
0
fix ref to ISD-AS assignments
#81
nicorusti
closed
2 weeks ago
0
Add header overview figure in intro
#80
nicorusti
closed
2 weeks ago
0
Removed SIG protocol description
#79
knmeynell
closed
2 weeks ago
1
Remove SIG description from the draft
#78
nicorusti
closed
2 weeks ago
0
Add header overview figure in intro
#77
nicorusti
closed
2 weeks ago
0
Suggested change to remove specific reference to CPU cores
#76
knmeynell
closed
2 weeks ago
2
sig: clarify what's required for compatibility and what is unspecified
#75
jiceatscion
closed
2 weeks ago
0
remove mention of multiple ISDs
#74
nicorusti
closed
3 weeks ago
1
Remove mention of AS in multiple ISDs
#73
nicorusti
closed
3 weeks ago
0
Incorporated minor change to pseudo header description.
#72
knmeynell
closed
3 weeks ago
0
Clarify claims about communication between IPs
#71
nicorusti
closed
3 weeks ago
0
Checksum rewording
#70
nicorusti
closed
3 weeks ago
0
Intro: clarify relation with other drafts, deprecate overview draft, reference to SCIONLab
#69
knmeynell
closed
3 weeks ago
0
Expanded on SCION-IP Gateway
#68
knmeynell
closed
3 weeks ago
2
Updated Intro and added Change Log in Appendix
#67
knmeynell
closed
4 weeks ago
0
Add changelog in appendix
#66
nicorusti
closed
4 weeks ago
0
mtu: add clarifications
#65
jiceatscion
closed
1 month ago
1
security_considerations: payload modification
#64
jiceatscion
closed
1 month ago
0
flow_label: rename flow ID to Flow Label and document by reference to RFC6437
#63
jiceatscion
closed
1 month ago
0
layer2: rephrase the L2 AS-AS link description
#62
jiceatscion
closed
1 month ago
0
clarify router checks
#61
nicorusti
closed
2 months ago
0
Clarify the validity of peering links
#60
jiceatscion
closed
1 month ago
1
SCMP review
#59
nicorusti
closed
1 month ago
6
fix bfd description in empty path, add JC as author
#58
nicorusti
closed
2 months ago
0
Clarify the router alert flags and relationship to the ConsIngress/egress fields
#57
jiceatscion
closed
1 month ago
1
Peering links clarifications
#56
nicorusti
closed
1 month ago
0
Life of a packet: is L2 link possible?
#55
nicorusti
closed
1 month ago
5
FlowID / IPv6 Flow Label
#54
nicorusti
closed
1 month ago
2
Make header field lengths and descriptions consistent
#53
nicorusti
opened
2 months ago
0
Clarify wether routers perform checks on segment types (up/down/core)
#52
nicorusti
opened
2 months ago
2
Substantial updates
#51
knmeynell
closed
2 months ago
1
Changes to SCION Header Specification section
#50
knmeynell
closed
2 months ago
1
describe scmp and bfd.
#49
jiceatscion
closed
2 months ago
0
Clarify that document does not relate to previous IETF work
#48
nicorusti
closed
2 months ago
2
Upper layer checksums
#47
nicorusti
closed
3 weeks ago
1
Added SCION IP Gateway section
#46
knmeynell
closed
2 months ago
1
General review - forward references
#45
nicorusti
closed
2 months ago
3
Payload integrity discussion - add section in security considerations
#44
nicorusti
closed
1 month ago
3
Clarify claims about communication between IPs
#43
nicorusti
closed
3 weeks ago
0
Clarify Interface IDs & ConsIngress/ConsEgress
#42
nicorusti
closed
3 months ago
1
Clarify Interface IDs & ConsIngress/ConsEgress & Router Alert flags
#41
nicorusti
closed
1 month ago
6
Specify SCION-IP Gateways
#40
nicorusti
closed
2 weeks ago
3
Add discussion about MTU & fragmentation
#39
nicorusti
closed
1 month ago
6
Anapaya review
#38
nicorusti
opened
3 months ago
3
Clarify how routers use BFD
#37
nicorusti
closed
2 months ago
0
Clarify handling link failures
#36
nicorusti
closed
1 month ago
2
Use auto-generated references
#35
nicorusti
closed
2 months ago
0
Proof of transit: mention why it is not needed
#34
nicorusti
closed
2 months ago
0
Next