scipag / HardeningKitty

HardeningKitty - Checks and hardens your Windows configuration
MIT License
1.29k stars 158 forks source link

Case 19.6.6.1.1 is missing severity #19

Closed FLeven closed 2 years ago

FLeven commented 2 years ago

invoke-hardeningKitty .\lists\finding_list_cis_microsoft_windows_11_enterprise_21h2_user.csv -EmojiSupport -Mode Audit

Output: [*] 8/6/2022 9:25:35 AM - Starting Category Administrative Templates: System [😺] ID 19.6.6.1.1, Internet Communication Management: Internet Communication Settings: Turn off Help Experience Improvement Program, Result=1, Severity=Passed

Log: "19.6.6.1.1","Internet Communication Management: Internet Communication Settings: Turn off Help Experience Improvement Program","Passed","1"

0x6d69636b commented 2 years ago

As far as I can see this seems okay: The result of the check is 1, which is also the recommendation, therefore Passed is correct. Could you please explain me what is wrong here?

FLeven commented 2 years ago

The Results gets Mixed Up, severity is Interpreted as passed, because the Case Input ist missing a severity level. This can and will lead to false results. A Check for complete Input, empty Input, Low,medium,high severity level could help to mitigate future errors from incomplete list entrys passed to the Test Framework.

0x6d69636b commented 2 years ago

Sorry I don't get it, there is a severity in the list: https://github.com/scipag/HardeningKitty/blob/master/lists/finding_list_cis_microsoft_windows_11_enterprise_21h2_user.csv#L6? Maybe you could give me an example of a false result to help me understand this issue?

FLeven commented 2 years ago

Two results of this Test:

First one, OK -> Severity = Medium [*] 8/6/2022 8:12:12 PM - Starting Category Administrative Templates: Start Menu and Taskbar [$] ID 19.5.1.1, Notifications: Turn off toast notifications on the lock screen, Result=0, Recommended=1, Severity=Medium

Second Result, not OK -> Severity = passed [*] 8/6/2022 8:12:12 PM - Starting Category Administrative Templates: System [+] ID 19.6.6.1.1, Internet Communication Management: Internet Communication Settings: Turn off Help Experience Improvement Program, Result=1, Severity=Passed

A severity level of passed, should be impossible

Same is found in the logfile, if you choose to create one.

0x6d69636b commented 2 years ago

But the result 1 for check 19.6.6.1.1 equals the recommendation 1, so therefore the check is passed. I decided to list all tests, positive and negative, to see what was tested in the first place

FLeven commented 2 years ago

It is about consistency and if I use the exported report csv, I will have problems because of the missing fields in some rows. I just noticed it happens on all tests, where the Name has more then one colon in it.

ckeck: invoke-hardeningKitty .\lists\finding_list_cis_microsoft_windows_11_enterprise_21h2_machine.csv -Mode Audit

"ID","Name","Severity","Result","Recommended" -> 5 Fields😺 "19.1.3.1","Enable screen saver","Medium","","1"-> 5 Fields😺 "19.1.3.2","Password protect the screen saver","Medium","","1"-> 5 Fields😺 "19.1.3.3","Screen saver timeout","Medium","","900"-> 5 Fields😺 "19.5.1.1","Notifications: Turn off toast notifications on the lock screen","Medium","0","1"-> 5 Fields😺 "19.6.6.1.1","Internet Communication Management: Internet Communication Settings: Turn off Help Experience Improvement Program","Passed","1"-> 4 Fields😿

0x6d69636b commented 2 years ago

Ah, I see: The recommendation value is not part of the output if a test is passed. I'll change this behaviour

0x6d69636b commented 2 years ago

Old: [😺] ID 19.6.6.1.1, Internet Communication Management: Internet Communication Settings: Turn off Help Experience Improvement Program, Result=1, Severity=Passed [😿] ID 19.7.4.1, Attachment Manager: Do not preserve zone information in file attachments, Result=, Recommended=2, Severity=Medium

New: [😺] ID 19.6.6.1.1, Internet Communication Management: Internet Communication Settings: Turn off Help Experience Improvement Program, Result=1, Recommended=1, Severity=Passed [😿] ID 19.7.4.1, Attachment Manager: Do not preserve zone information in file attachments, Result=, Recommended=2, Severity=Medium

New (Log): ID 19.6.6.1.1, Internet Communication Management: Internet Communication Settings: Turn off Help Experience Improvement Program, Result=1, Recommended=1, Severity=Passed ID 19.7.4.1, Attachment Manager: Do not preserve zone information in file attachments, Result=, Recommended=2, Severity=Medium

FLeven commented 2 years ago

OK, but Severity=Passed is still wrong, it should always be LOW, MEDIUM or High ? This is a problem if I export and import the data elsewhere.

I really with you had gone the Pester and Nunit Report way ...

0x6d69636b commented 2 years ago

It depends on the state/definition of Severity. I use severity here for the result of the test, but - if I understand you correctly - you'd like having the information what the severity of the check itself is? Would two rows help (severity result, severity check)?

FLeven commented 2 years ago

If I export the data and use it elsewhere, I like to explain the data, color all failed high tests red and discuss them to be solved first etc. If the severity level is missing from the csv, I would have to crosscheck the original lists to find out ,what severity level the test "Internet Communication Management: Internet Communication Settings: Turn off Help Experience Improvement Program" might be. Next month we continue with all failed medium tests etc.

0x6d69636b commented 2 years ago

Gotcha! My requirement is to have a severity with {Passed,Low, Medium...}, however I can add a result_test = {Passed,Failed} and a severity_finding {Low, Medium, High, Critical} to the output, log, and report. What do you think?

FLeven commented 2 years ago

Yes, please. This way the two pieces of information are unique and don't get mixed up, thanx.

0x6d69636b commented 2 years ago

I updated the format of the report file in a new commit in the development repo: https://github.com/0x6d69636b/windows_hardening/commit/9166ed82a54344b0d87407b401059d1c18dd1e29

FLeven commented 2 years ago

looks good, thx.