scipy-conference / scipy_proceedings

Tools used to generate the SciPy conference proceedings
Other
228 stars 530 forks source link

SciPy 2020 proceedings DOI mismatch #602

Closed matthewfeickert closed 4 years ago

matthewfeickert commented 4 years ago

Hi, it seems that there is a mismatch in the DOIs that are listed on the Accepted Paper Slides page for SciPy 2020 and on Zenodo. The DOI link for pyhf is

pyhf: a pure Python statistical fitting library with tensors and autograd, Matthew Feickert doi.org/10.25080/Majora-342d178e-022

but that redirects to the Zenodo entry for "Molecular infrastructure for modeling viruses with pythonic-mediated packages: pyF4all". If you click on the DOI link on the pyF4all: doi.org/10.25080/Majora-342d178e-021 that also redirects to the Pandera entry (which is 020). So as one would then expect the entry for

Bringing GPU Support to Datashader: A RAPIDS Case Study, Jon Mease doi.org/10.25080/Majora-342d178e-023

redirects to the pyhf entry on Zenodo.

I haven't looked into this further yet, but it seems there's some off by 1 error happening.

cc @deniederhut

deniederhut commented 4 years ago

😬 let me take a look ivan-marroquin notifications@github.com wrote: “Hi, it seems that there is a mismatch in the DOIs that are listed on the Accepted Paper Slides page for SciPy 2020 and on Zenodo. The DOI link for pyhf is

“pyhf: a pure Python statistical fitting library with tensors and autograd, Matthew Feickert  doi.org/10.25080/Majora-342d178e-022”

but that redirects to the Zenodo entry for "Molecular infrastructure for modeling viruses with pythonic-mediated packages: pyF4all"

If you click on the DOI link on the pyF4all: doi.org/10.25080/Majora-342d178e-021 that also redirects to the Pandera entry (which is 020). So as one would then expect the entry for

“Bringing GPU Support to Datashader: A RAPIDS Case Study, Jon Mease  doi.org/10.25080/Majora-342d178e-023”

redirects to the pyhf entry on Zenodo.

I haven't looked into this further yet, but it seems there's some off by 1 error happening.

cc @deniederhut”

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

matthewfeickert commented 4 years ago

😬 let me take a look

Thanks @deniederhut — truly much appreciated. But this is obviously a low priority and a hard task (I'm trying to similarly get a large number of Zenodo DOIs for a conference at the moment).

deniederhut commented 4 years ago

So it looks like it was only the display DOIs that got jumbled -- everything got registered okay. The conference website has already been fixed, but updating the entries in Zenodo will take a bit longer.

matthewfeickert commented 4 years ago

So it looks like it was only the display DOIs that got jumbled -- everything got registered okay.

Sounds good! As long as I can know that

DOI

should stay attached to pyhf then that's all the information I need for now. Thanks!

deniederhut commented 4 years ago

Okay this should be fixed everywhere now. Please feel free to reopen if further issues.