Paper: Echodataflow: Recipe-based Fisheries Acoustics Workflow Orchestration

[valentina-s]

If you are creating this PR in order to submit a draft of your paper, please name your PR with Paper: <title>. An editor will then add a paper label and GitHub Actions will be run to check and build your paper.

See the project readme for more information.

Editor: Meghann Agarwal @mepa

Reviewers:

• Ruman Dagol @gol-danRuman
• Nadia Tahiri @TahiriNadia
• Meghann Agarwal @mepa

[github-actions[bot]]

Curvenote Preview

Directory	Preview	Checks	Updated (UTC)
papers/valentina_staneva	🔍 Inspect	✅ 88 checks passed (28 optional)	Sep 3, 2024, 9:47 PM

[ameyxd]

@valentina-s thanks for your submission! Can you update the DOIs for "echopy_2024" and "korneliussen_lsss_2006"? We can run the checks again after.

you may be able to add citation keys you want to ignore if their DOIs don't exist in myst.yml under error_rules:

error_rules:
    - rule: doi-exists
      severity: ignore
      keys:
        - abc
        - def01

[TahiriNadia]

Hi @valentina-s,

I'm Nadia Tahiri. I will be one of the reviewers of your paper, and I will provide detailed comments and suggestions soon.

Cheers,

[ameyxd]

@valentina-s thanks for your submission! Can you update the DOIs for "echopy_2024" and "korneliussen_lsss_2006"? We can run the checks again after.

you may be able to add citation keys you want to ignore if their DOIs don't exist in myst.yml under error_rules:

error_rules:

    - rule: doi-exists

      severity: ignore

      keys:

        - abc

        - def01

Hi @valentina-s are you skipping any valid DOIs? We have fixed issues with failing checks for valid DOIs. please check and lmk. 🙂

[mepa]

Hi @gol-danRuman and @TahiriNadia! In case a little extra time is needed, the initial complete review deadline has been extended to next Wednesday, July 3rd.

[TahiriNadia]

Dear @valentina-s, I will list my comments one by one below in detail.

The submitted article explores the application of a recipe-based approach to dataflow orchestration within the fisheries context. This methodology aims to optimize data processing workflows in fisheries research and management by leveraging advanced scientific computing techniques. The article is highly relevant, well-structured, and written with clarity.

[valentina-s]

Dear @valentina-s, I will list my comments one by one below in detail.

The submitted article explores the application of a recipe-based approach to dataflow orchestration within the fisheries context. This methodology aims to optimize data processing workflows in fisheries research and management by leveraging advanced scientific computing techniques. The article is highly relevant, well-structured, and written with clarity.

Thanks @TahiriNadia! I am looking forward to your comments, and will fill in missing DOI's per @ameyxd's comment.

[mepa]

Hi @gol-danRuman and @TahiriNadia, the Proceedings Committee has extended the initial complete review deadline to Monday, July 8th. Thanks so much for volunteering to review and we look forward to seeing your comments!

[TahiriNadia]

Dear @valentina-s et al.,

Thank you for the updates. Please tag me back in when the paper is ready for a re-review!

Cheers,

[mepa]

Hi @valentina-s, have you have a chance to look at the reviewer's comments on your paper? Just a heads up that it may take more than one iteration of review before the forthcoming final author revision deadline.

[mepa]

Hey @valentina-s, I will be stepping in to provide a second review for this paper. I look forward to reviewing it and will plan to post comments later this evening.

[TahiriNadia]

Dear @valentina-s,

Thank you for the updates. Please tag me back in when the paper is ready for a re-review!

Cheers, Nadia

[TahiriNadia]

Dear @valentina-s,

The error from Dask reference. 'DOI Exists: Citation does not have DOI: dask'

Best

[valentina-s]

@TahiriNadia Thanks for the review! I have converted the images to text snippets, corrected references, and added more explanation of the varying dimensions across deployments and the associated challenges in the end of the Motivation section. Now the checks are passing, but if some references do not look as expected let me know (should I leave the ones with n. d. as is?).

[valentina-s]

Thanks @mepa for the review. I have addressed your comments.

[mepa]

@valentina-s, thanks for making those updates.

Though I did not get the chance to run echodataflow and potentially provide further feedback before the author revision deadline, I read the paper over again and do feel it is ready for inclusion in the Proceedings.

[mepa]

@TahiriNadia, thanks very much for reviewing! Do you approve this paper for inclusion in the Proceedings?