Paper: How the Scientific Python ecosystem helps answer fundamental questions of the Universe

[matthewfeickert]

This PR adds the myst.md paper source for the SciPy 2024 proceedings for the talk "How the Scientific Python ecosystem helps answer fundamental questions of the Universe".

Editor: Hongsup Shin @hongsupshin

Reviewers:

• Cainã Max Couto da Silva @cmcouto-silva
• Marcus Hill @Marcdh3

[matthewfeickert]

This has been placed in draft mode as I'm still continuing to write. I'm opening the PR now to ensure that it is created before the May 31 deadline.

[matthewfeickert]

The curvenote / publish / check checks are failing as

 ❯ content (22/29 tests passed)
    × DOI Exists: Citation does not have DOI: S2I2HEPSP
    × DOI Exists: Citation does not have DOI: PyHEP
    × DOI Exists: Citation does not have DOI: nanobind
    × DOI Exists: Citation does not have DOI: ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-001
    × DOI Exists: Citation does not have DOI: Dask
    × DOI Exists: Citation does not have DOI: Dask-awkward
    × DOI Exists: Citation does not have DOI: Dask-histogram

If I'm citing things that don't have DOIs (like software that doesn't have an archive on Zenodo) is there a way to communicate this to Curvenote to make it clear this is intended?

[leewujung]

@matthewfeickert you can add citation keys you want to ignore in myst.yml under error_rules:

  error_rules:
    - rule: doi-exists
      severity: ignore
      keys:
        - Atr03
        - terradesert

[ameyxd]

@matthewfeickert can you make this update so we can run checks?

[github-actions[bot]]

Curvenote Preview

Directory	Preview	Checks	Updated (UTC)
papers/matthew_feickert	🔍 Inspect	✅ 76 checks passed (18 optional)	Jun 20, 2024, 1:52 AM

[cbcunc]

@matthewfeickert Just a reminder that first submissions must be compete by today. Please do what you need to do to get your PR out of the draft state so we can mark it ready for review and assign a reviewer. We assign reviewers to papers all at once and not piecemeal paper by paper.

[matthewfeickert]

We assign reviewers to papers all at once and not piecemeal paper by paper.

I don't understand this last comment, but I'll assume that it is not something that affects actionable information on my side. Thanks for the reminder that the deadline is today at 23:59 Pacific. :+1:

[hongsupshin]

We assign reviewers to papers all at once and not piecemeal paper by paper.

I don't understand this last comment, but I'll assume that it is not something that affects actionable information on my side. Thanks for the reminder that the deadline is today at 23:59 Pacific. 👍

No worries @matthewfeickert, we assigned two reviewers to your paper :)

[matthewfeickert]

Thanks very much for your review @Marcdh3! We will get to work on incorporating your feedback shortly (hopefully before SciPy starts).