Reviews were conducted by @minrk in #8 and @satra in #16.
@minrk submitted minor corrections that were accepted in #7.
Reviewers were generally satisfied, some minor copy corrections were suggested (and implemented by @minrk). @hugadams noted in #7 that he lost some of the data from the original experiments and is unable to regenerate plot figures.
It is the decision of the editors that this paper has passed the peer review standards set by the SciPy 2012 Organizing Committee. Thanks to everyone for their contribution.
Reviews were conducted by @minrk in #8 and @satra in #16.
@minrk submitted minor corrections that were accepted in #7.
Reviewers were generally satisfied, some minor copy corrections were suggested (and implemented by @minrk). @hugadams noted in #7 that he lost some of the data from the original experiments and is unable to regenerate plot figures.
It is the decision of the editors that this paper has passed the peer review standards set by the SciPy 2012 Organizing Committee. Thanks to everyone for their contribution.