Closed cbrnr closed 8 years ago
93.17%
Merging #161 into master will not affect coverage as of
446174b
@@ master #161 diff @@
======================================
Files 47 47
Stmts 3471 3471
Branches 396 396
Methods 0 0
======================================
Hit 3234 3234
Partial 70 70
Missed 167 167
Review entire Coverage Diff as of
446174b
Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.
Looks goot to me.
Fixes #53. I think standard Infomax has problems with estimating sources as discussed in #160. Although I'm not sure that the toy example shown there is related to differences in components obtained with Anaconda vs. Homebrew Python, extended Infomax is the default choice for anyone applying ICA to EEG data. Therefore, we should use it too.