Test files needed for Rigol 1000C waveforms

scottprahl commented 4 years ago

The code is in the repository, but it is untested. A few sets of saved waveforms created by a Rigol DS1000C, DS1000M, DS1000CD, DS1000MD, DS1062CA, DS1102CA, DS1202CA, or DS1302CA scope would fix this. Each set should contain

file.wfm
file.csv
file.txt (created when saving CSV files with "Para Save" ON)

Ideally the saved waveforms would cover a range of vertical and horizontal settings.

beta-tester commented 2 years ago

does your project support DS1042C ? i took a look to the magic numbers but none of them seems to match to that in my wfm file. DS1042C.zip

in the maximum csv file seems a bit buggy - loss of resolution in time axis.

scottprahl commented 2 years ago

@beta-tester thanks for the source files. The magic numbers are messed up. I have no idea what Rigol was thinking when they created them. They seem to be used inconsistently. Anyhow, I just released v0.9.4 which should work for you.

beta-tester commented 2 years ago

thank you for adding the DS1042C and the update.

i can see a little drift in the x-axis (time) then looking to the converted DS1042C wfm to csv file. signal0_wfmconverter.csv.zip

starting at line 5246 (at -4.845049ms) the interval is not 0.000050ms.

$ wfmconvert C csv signal0.wfm
$ cat signal0.csv

X,CH 1,Start,Increment
ms,mV,-6.000000e-03,1.000000e-05
-5.107200,60.00
-5.107150,60.00
-5.107100,60.00
...
-4.845250,60.00
-4.845200,20.00
-4.845150,60.00
-4.845100,20.00
-4.845049,20.00
-4.844999,60.00
-4.844949,60.00
-4.844899,40.00
-4.844849,20.00
...
7.213373,560.00
7.213423,300.00
7.213473,100.00
7.213523,100.00
7.213574,60.00
7.213624,20.00
7.213674,40.00
7.213724,40.00
7.213774,60.00
7.213824,-20.00
...

this drift propergates over the file. is that a rounding error or is that the nature of the rampling rate vs. time base of the scope?

and are Start and Increment right?

scottprahl / RigolWFM

Test files needed for Rigol 1000C waveforms #2