Open cbrunnkvist opened 3 years ago
We can see an example of something similar used in the context of mutation testing.
(n.b. JS in the linked example - but the same principle)
This should be somewhat possible. We just merged in https://github.com/scoverage/sbt-scoverage/pull/297 which will include test names which would then be able to be grouped and mapped.
Is there a way to correlate the name of tests to different files / section of the coverage report? Or vice-versa.
I'm doing some test analysis automation and even a "tests-to-source-files-covered" map would be of great value. As of now, if I have a change to source file F, I have no way of knowing which test classes are relevant to this file, even less so to which lines of that file.