Open sirthias opened 9 years ago
Yes it should be. I'll add that.
Is this still being considered? I'm using scoverage in a very match-heavy project and would love to get more accurate branching coverage.
My current project has been hit by this behavior. Anyone working on this?
In the HTML table listing lines, methods, statements and Branches along with their coverage percentage for every class pattern matches are not counted as branches. This can result in misleading coverage data.
I'd expect each case-branch of a pattern match be counted as a branch.