scrapinghub / spidermon

Scrapy Extension for monitoring spiders execution.
https://spidermon.readthedocs.io
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
526 stars 94 forks source link

Release 1.17.1 #377

Closed serhii73 closed 1 year ago

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 74.62% // Head: 74.62% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (adc9e4a) compared to base (e4bf704). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #377 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 74.62% 74.62% ======================================= Files 73 73 Lines 3113 3113 Branches 366 366 ======================================= Hits 2323 2323 Misses 725 725 Partials 65 65 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/scrapinghub/spidermon/pull/377?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=scrapinghub) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [spidermon/\_\_init\_\_.py](https://codecov.io/gh/scrapinghub/spidermon/pull/377?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=scrapinghub#diff-c3BpZGVybW9uL19faW5pdF9fLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=scrapinghub). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=scrapinghub)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

serhii73 commented 1 year ago

Thank you for your review @rennerocha
Can you please recheck this PR? Thanks in advance.

proway2 commented 1 year ago

We've been waiting for the new feature for so long :-)

@rennerocha would you please check it again?