Closed Nirzak closed 3 years ago
Should I also update publish.yml? And another thing. I think readthedocs supports python 3.9 now. https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/config-file/v2.html I have seen both scrapy and parsel repositories are using python 3.8 for this. Should we update this?
Should I also update publish.yml?
Yes, please!
And another thing. I think readthedocs supports python 3.9 now. https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/config-file/v2.html I have seen both scrapy and parsel repositories are using python 3.8 for this. Should we update this?
Yes, and I think they also support 3.10.
Should I also update publish.yml?
Yes, please!
And another thing. I think readthedocs supports python 3.9 now. https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/config-file/v2.html I have seen both scrapy and parsel repositories are using python 3.8 for this. Should we update this?
Yes, and I think they also support 3.10.
Yeah updated it. Please check now if any other changes are needed?
Merging #230 (0fc2c2f) into master (fdba8af) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #230 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 5 5
Lines 290 290
Branches 50 50
=========================================
Hits 290 290
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fdba8af...0fc2c2f. Read the comment docs.
Thank you. I think that’s it.
The only failing check is due to a new version of pylint which adds new checks. We should probably handle that separately, in a similar fashion to how it was handled in Scrapy (probably also pinning the pylint version to avoid similar issues in the future), so I think it is fine to merge this pull request as is, as soon as another maintainer also approves the changes.
Thank you. I think that’s it.
The only failing check is due to a new version of pylint which adds new checks. We should probably handle that separately, in a similar fashion to how it was handled in Scrapy (probably also pinning the pylint version to avoid similar issues in the future), so I think it is fine to merge this pull request as is, as soon as another maintainer also approves the changes.
Ok sir.
Updated test workflow and added classifier to support python 3.10.