Open jcohenadad opened 1 week ago
From your comment, I understand that we should use the original file only for vertebral labeling. For the rest, we should use the post-processed file right ? Also, for the lesion segmentation, do you want to include only cervical spine ? Or thoracic and lumbar as well (in this case, it would make sense to include thoracic and lumbar in the previous sections as well) ?
From your comment, I understand that we should use the original file only for vertebral labeling. For the rest, we should use the post-processed file right ?
not necessarily-- we could go with the denoised one (if this is what you meant by "post-processed")-- Also, we should consider the other contrasts-- i've updated my initial post
Also, for the lesion segmentation, do you want to include only cervical spine ? Or thoracic and lumbar as well (in this case, it would make sense to include thoracic and lumbar in the previous sections as well) ?
let's start with cervical only, for the sake of simplicity-- I suspect there is little amount of lesions in the thoraco-lumbar-- but as we receive the data we can reconsider
Based on the data @plbenveniste and I received from the HC, we can already make decisions about what image contrast to choose for each task. Below is a proposal:
Csp Ax T2
Csp Sag 3D Fiesta
Csp Sag Cube T2 Focus
ORIG SAG T2 LOC UPPER DL
Sag T2 STIR
Ax T2
Ax MERGE