Closed PaulBautin closed 4 years ago
Last commits implement review comments. Could you do a second review @jcohenadad?
User is now able to indicate in command line his vertebrae levels of interest. Code is ready for review @jcohenadad . I have tested code for intra-subject variabilty (transformed images are considered like different subjects) and packaging everything seems to be working well.
Ok, I have updated branch for everything to be compatible with master. The branch has been tested and everything seems to work fine. However i have not created a 'config' file for user to choose vertebrae of interest, by default every vertebrae levels present in the csv files are used, i think this keeps things simple. What do you think @jcohenadad ?
The branch is ready for review. I have added:
The new approach for the manual corrections script will be integrated in a new PR (issue has already been open #23 ). PR is ready for new review @jcohenadad .
List of corrections completed in last commit:
Ready for review again, @jcohenadad.
To summarize before PR close.
This PR has addressed numerous subjects such as:
So far most stats plots were computed with arrays. The use of pandas simplifies and clarifies the plots.
DONE: -refactoring "csa_rescale_stat" plots with pandas
When using "sct_label_vertebrae" 20% of subject labelling were false. The use of "-scale-dist" improves vertebrae detection to only 5% false labelling. To prevent subject overlapping, subjects already in results were removed before re-run. To enable manual labelling commented lines should be activated.
DONE: -delete already existing subjects in results -add options for labelling (comments) -add scaling in intervertebral distance for labelling
TODO: