Open CharlotteFeidicker opened 3 years ago
Not it should not cause a problem. I usually try to use the page numbers printed on the page. This makes things less confusing. So just change it to 476.
We still need to create the ids for each page before the images will start showing up. :)
Okay, that sounds good, so I am going to change the numbers after we discussed my last pull request (I think that it does not make sense to "ask" a new PR while the old one is not merged yet, does it?). :)
You can just push your next commit and it will get added to the existing Pull Request. :)
jw
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:22 AM Charlotte Feidicker < @.***> wrote:
Okay, that sounds good, so I am going to change the numbers after we discussed my last pull request (I think that it does not make sense to "ask" a new PR while the old one is not merged yet, does it?). :)
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/scta-texts/bcg6es/issues/12#issuecomment-824885899, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIX6POKGE6PNJ3W3ECAAATTKAWKTANCNFSM43LYUVXA .
-- Dr. Jeffrey C. Witt Philosophy Department Loyola University Maryland 4501 N. Charles St. Baltimore, MD 21210 www.jeffreycwitt.com
Dear Jeff, I added the second distinctio and changed the first page-break-number to the right number. Is there a script that you can use easily to addaped the following page-break-numbers? If not, I can adapt them manually.
Yes I have a script for that. I'll do it
Charlotte Feidicker @.***> schrieb am Do., 29. Apr. 2021, 2:35 AM:
Dear Jeff, I added the second distinctio and changed the first page-break-number to the right number. Is there a script that you can use easily to addaped the following page-break-numbers? If not, I can adapt them manually.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/scta-texts/bcg6es/issues/12#issuecomment-828976510, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIX6PMZMTGTEPCW5BEEUU3TLD447ANCNFSM43LYUVXA .
Dear Jeff, when you asked me on what page the 5. distinctio started, I confirmed
<pb ed="#P" n="564"/>
as the first page of it. That was because Transkribus told me so. Unfortunately I think that I was wrong. Can I change the page-numbers or would this change cause any problem? The page-number written on the physical page of the document of 1632 is 476.