`nearest_n_within` does not limit the number of items when not sorted

[Nahor]

In kiddo v4.2.0, nearest_n_within will only limit the number of items if sorting is enabled. If it's disabled, all the items within the radius are returned.

E.g. in the cities example, replace nearest_n with nearest_n_within and a radius of 10km.

-let nearest_5_idx = kdtree.nearest_n::<SquaredEuclidean>(&query, 5);
+let nearest_5_idx = kdtree.nearest_n_within::<SquaredEuclidean>(
+     &query,
+     kilometres_to_unit_sphere_squared_euclidean(10.0),
+    5,
+    false,
+);

This outputs 13 cities (for my data set) instead of the expected 5. If the list is sorted, then it works as expected.

---

Also note that the example in the documentation for nearest_n_within creates a tree of 2 items, asks for 2 items, and then is happy because it got 2 items in return!

[sdd]

Whoops! Thanks for spotting this. Will fix in an upcoming release as soon as I can.

[ezrasingh]

Do you have any information on the release date for the next version?

I encountered the same bug in my project and was wondering when the fix from #175 will be available.

[Nahor]

@ezrasingh , you can always use the git repo instead of a released crate:

kiddo = { git = "https://github.com/sdd/kiddo.git", rev = "cc62c6d76accdeba75c0f55db80c28eab8a21ae7" }

[ezrasingh]

Hey @Nahor,

I pinned Kiddo to that revision in my crate, but my unit tests are still failing. Initially, I thought it might be due to stale code on my machine. However, the tests also failed in CI.

Could this possibly be a regression?

[ezrasingh]

I just submitted a PR (#180) to validate the consistency of the behavior when max_qty = 0. During testing, I found that the function handles this case differently depending on whether the results are sorted or not. Specifically, the issue arises when sorted = false, where the function does not return an empty vec as expected, unlike when sorted = true.

This difference explains why pinning Kiddo did not work for my case. While I can work around this with a conditional branch, I don't believe this inconsistent behavior is intended. If it works with sorted results, it should also work with unsorted results, ensuring consistent handling of max_qty = 0.

[sdd]

Hey all - just released v4.2.1: https://crates.io/crates/kiddo/4.2.1

[ezrasingh]

Hi @sdd, so far v4.2.1 has been great however I notice this release still fails one of the edge case I added in PR #180:

Calling nearest_n_within when max_qty = 0:

• using sorted = false will panic
• using sorted = true returns an empty Vec as expected

[sdd]

Aah hey Ezra, I'll take a look over this weekend and see if I can get a fix out.