sdn-sense / siterm

Apache License 2.0
3 stars 5 forks source link

Agent should not report Siterm-background process status #575

Closed juztas closed 3 weeks ago

juztas commented 1 month ago
[Thu Jun 20 16:46:19.923317 2024] [wsgi:error] [pid 275:tid 140313345844992] [remote 10.16.14.51:43096] Send 400 error. More details: {"error_description": "Server does not support parameter servicename=SiteRM-Background-Process-Runner. Supported: ['Agent', 'Ruler', 'Debugger', 'LookUpService', 'ProvisioningService', 'SNMPMonitoring', 'Prometheus-Push', 'Arp-Push', 'ConfigFetcher', 'ALL']", "error": 400}
[Thu Jun 20 16:46:20.939740 2024] [wsgi:error] [pid 275:tid 140313345844992] [remote 10.16.14.51:43172] Send 400 error. More details: {"error_description": "Server does not support parameter servicename=SiteRM-Background-Process-Runner. Supported: ['Agent', 'Ruler', 'Debugger', 'LookUpService', 'ProvisioningService', 'SNMPMonitoring', 'Prometheus-Push', 'Arp-Push', 'ConfigFetcher', 'ALL']", "error": 400}
[Thu Jun 20 16:46:21.957037 2024] [wsgi:error] [pid 275:tid 140313337452288] [remote 10.16.14.51:40276] Send 400 error. More details: {"error_description": "Server does not support parameter servicename=SiteRM-Background-Process-Runner. Supported: ['Agent', 'Ruler', 'Debugger', 'LookUpService', 'ProvisioningService', 'SNMPMonitoring', 'Prometheus-Push', 'Arp-Push', 'ConfigFetcher', 'ALL']", "error": 400}
juztas commented 3 weeks ago

It was manual run without --noreporting flag. So there is no bug