Closed mariumtapal closed 2 years ago
One potential solution to your data storage and documentation problems would be to store the data in tidy form as two long tables. So, greenland_sites
would be a 28 x 2 tibble with variables sample_id
and bsi_percent
, and then greenland_wavenumber
would be a 3698 x 2 tibble with variables sample_id
and wavenumber
. Then your data is tidy, and you only have to document three variables (which is all you have).
Better yet, you could call the smaller table sites
and include the data from Alaska and wherever else as well. Then the big table would be greenland
, and when you add Alaska, it would just be another big table called alaska
.
looking at last commit 43bf979
install_github
: ✅0 errors ✓ | 0 warnings ✓ | 0 notes ✓
@beanumber