Update webpack 5.91.0 → 5.92.0 (minor)

[depfu[bot]]

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ webpack (5.91.0 → 5.92.0) · Repo

Release Notes

5.92.0

Bug Fixes

• Correct tidle range's comutation for module federation
• Consider runtime for pure expression dependency update hash
• Return value in the subtractRuntime function for runtime logic
• Fixed failed to resolve promise when eager import a dynamic cjs
• Avoid generation extra code for external modules when remapping is not required
• The css/global type now handles the exports name
• Avoid hashing for @keyframe and @property at-rules in css/global type
• Fixed mangle with destructuring for JSON modules
• The stats.hasWarnings() method now respects the ignoreWarnings option
• Fixed ArrayQueue iterator
• Correct behavior of __webpack_exports_info__.a.b.canMangle
• Changed to the correct plugin name for the CommonJsChunkFormatPlugin plugin
• Set the chunkLoading option to the import when environment is unknown and output is module
• Fixed when runtimeChunk has no exports when module chunkFormat used
• [CSS] Fixed parsing minimized CSS import
• [CSS] URLs in CSS files now have correct public path
• [CSS] The css module type should not allow parser to switch mode
• [Types] Improved context module types

New Features

• Added platform target properties to compiler
• Improved multi compiler cache location and validating it
• Support import attributes spec (with keyword)
• Support node: prefix for Node.js core modules in runtime code
• Support prefetch/preload for module chunk format
• Support "..." in the importsFields option for resolver
• Root module is less prone to be wrapped in IIFE
• Export InitFragment class for plugins
• Export compileBooleanMatcher util for plugins
• Export InputFileSystem and OutputFileSystem types
• [CSS] Support the esModule generator option for CSS modules
• [CSS] Support CSS when chunk format is module

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

---

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands

@​depfu rebase

Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update

@​depfu recreate

Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it

@​depfu merge

Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved

@​depfu cancel merge

Cancels automatic merging of this PR

@​depfu close

Closes this PR and deletes the branch

@​depfu reopen

Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)

@​depfu pause

Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR

@​depfu pause [minor|major]

Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR

@​depfu resume

Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)