Open Marksbutcher opened 11 months ago
Hi Mark, these numbers don't include Scope 3 emissions right now. Just curious, how would scope three emissions be helpful for a developer building with Salesforce features?
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:54 AM Mark Butcher @.***> wrote:
Can you please confirm if you are including the scope 3 emissions from the supply chain and if so which sub categories and how has this data been validated.
scope 3 from your context for AWS will be substantial
Also, do you include emissions other than server related?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/seamusocionnaigh/DeveloperCarbonDashboard/issues/2, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARUWOVYHHHARUXWDX5MWSATYAZSIXAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6MA2UQ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZRHE2TOMJQGEZTGNY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi, building in scope 3 is critical as without that the numbers are under reporting by anything up to 99%
Also, excluding scope 3 means that developers are only seeing a tiny part of the problem they are trying to solve. The scope 3 are the key component that showcase to a developer the true impact of their decisions
Can you please confirm if you are including the scope 3 emissions from the supply chain and if so which sub categories and how has this data been validated.
scope 3 from your context for AWS will be substantial
Also, do you include emissions other than server related?