Closed AndreaCrotti closed 5 years ago
I'd take a PR, especially if it could be implemented as a helper without changing the formatter (which it sounds like it could?)
Yes in theory I think it's possible, however it involves adding the left-join
key and updating the where
key, adding another condition there.
So if where
is not there is easy, if there is one condition already we have to wrap both in an :and
for example.
Is this kind of manipulation done already somewhere else @MichaelBlume ?
Ah actually merge-where
looks like the right thing to use anyway, so should be relatively easy to implement then thanks!
Given that the existing left-join
accepts "clauses" which provide the table (and perhaps alias) and then one or more connecting conditions, I'm not sure how you could specify just a table and a key here? It seems that you'd need the current "clauses" and then identify the key that should be added to the "where" clause -- which would duplicate part of one or more "clauses". I'm not convinced this is going to provide much reduction of code over a left-join
and a merge-where
with the key information given explicitly.
@AndreaCrotti Can you provide a specific example of how you see this working? I'm not convinced this is a worthwhile extension.
Closing for lack of response.
Yeah I tried a few things but maybe it's not worth since it's relatively easy to do anyway, thanks for the responses though
Not sure as a name it make sense but I this is what I'm talking about: http://www.urgenthomework.com/sql-left-excluding-join-homework-help
We have this scenario quite often, and I was wondering if it would make sense to add a helper which
So something like:
Having a look at the existing helpers I see that they only modify one key of the map at a time, but the only problem I could see could be if there is also a where helper being used, and how to actually merge the join clause with the others.
Would that be useful/feasible? Thanks