Closed nmatthews323 closed 5 years ago
So, for using PhaseTank, we need a script a bit like this:
perl PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl --genome /projects/nick_matthews/resources/Creinhardtii_236.fa --lib /projects/nick_matthews/sequencing_data/SL16/SL16.v_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii_transcript-v5.3.patman.redundant_aligned_reads.fasta.gz,/projects/nick_matthews/sequencing_data/SL17/SL17.v_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii_transcript-v5.3.patman.redundant_aligned_reads.fasta.gz,/projects/nick_matthews/sequencing_data/SL60/SL60.v_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii_transcript-v5.3.patman.redundant_aligned_reads.fasta.gz,/projects/nick_matthews/sequencing_data/SL74/SL74.v_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii_transcript-v5.3.patman.redundant_aligned_reads.fasta.gz,/projects/nick_matthews/sequencing_data/SL75/SL75.v_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii_transcript-v5.3.patman.redundant_aligned_reads.fasta.gz,/projects/nick_matthews/sequencing_data/SL76/SL76.v_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii_transcript-v5.3.patman.redundant_aligned_reads.fasta.gz
The paths to library files need to be seperated by commas, and need to be unzipped before they are passed to PhaseTank (not yet implemented). PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl is their script with one modification so it can extract counts from our libraries.
The filenames I think we need to use are added to "Summary_of_data.csv", with the column heading "PhasingFiles", to start with I think we should just start with the wt controls as identified by Adrian ($controls=="wt").
I've pulled your code into the repo and it seems to work indeed, at least trying it with one library as a test:
base=/projects/nick_matthews
libs=${base}/sequencing_data
perl PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl --genome ${base}/resources/Creinhardtii_236.fa --lib <(zcat ${libs}/SL16/SL16.v_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii_transcript-v5.3.patman.redundant_aligned_reads.fasta.gz)
Turns out it didn't work.. I'll unzip the files and we go with your version!
Update: I've uncompressed all files into /projects/nick_matthews/sequencing_data/fasta_all
.
OK, thanks Seb. Now I guess we try running with all the WTs on the cluster. Do you want to submit this or shall I? I don't know a way of doing without just assembling a very long bash command..
I was about to run it and created a scaffold file already, but wanted to double check some. run_PhaseTank.r
Before I run it I wanted to double check we are using the right reference.
According to your initial message, you used --genome Creinhardtii_236.fa
i.e. the genome as ref. How do you relate this back to the loci? Which output are you using for processing? Pred_tab_*
?
Or should we use the loci themselfs as reference, i.e. create a fasta file with an entry for each loci?
At the moment PhaseTank just looks for phased locations within the genome, irrespective of our locus map, I then compute overlaps between the phased regions identified by PhaseTank and our locus map:
And yes I'm using the Preftab file for processing:
We could certainly use a fasta file of our locus map as a reference. It would change the way we relate the loci. We need to make sure we have a clear locus naming convention so we can relate them to each other after phasing has.
To be honest, I think both approaches work. Using the fasta of the loci is a bit more rigorous, but I would imagine would result in the same (or very similar) output.
Nice work! I suppose that should do the trick. I'll push on then and let you know when it's done. To double check we can always check a few of loci on IGV later.
I've came across a whole different array of problems with insconsitent/empty fasta files. Upon solving it I know can't run PhaseTank anymore, it's driving me crazy and don't know why that is. I've created a test fasta file tmp.fa
. Do you have any idea why this doesn't work?
sm934@node13.plantsci.internal.cam.ac.uk/projects/nick_matthews/chlamy_locus_map_github/PhaseTank_v1.0‹master*› ☺➤perl PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl --genome /projects/nick_matthews/resources/Creinhardtii_236.fa --lib tmp.fa
############################## PhaseTank version1.0 ##############################
Run time: 2018.11.27_16:32:25
#Input files:
Rerference data: /projects/nick_matthews/resources/Creinhardtii_236.fa
Read file:
(1): tmp.fa
##Begin to check files at 2018.11.27_16:32:25..
Checking /projects/nick_matthews/resources/Creinhardtii_236.fa...
Checking tmp.fa...
##Finshed checking files
#Begin to normalize library at 2018.11.27_16:32:26..
#Begin to merge libraries at 2018.11.27_16:32:26..
Use of uninitialized value in addition (+) at PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl line 554, <LIB> line 2.
lines:1 abun:0
Use of uninitialized value $tmp_hash{"GAAGGAGGACGGTCACGCCCAA"} in division (/) at PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl line 566, <LIB> line 2.
Illegal division by zero at PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl line 566, <LIB> line 2.
Will take a look!
Updating on this:
Phasetank needs the count information for each read, in our libraries this comes after "count:" so I just needed to tweak the main script so it correctly splits the first line of each fasta read to extract the counts information, this file is on the github "PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl".
I therefore adopted the script to reflect this so instead of splitting by "_x": https://github.com/seb-mueller/chlamy_locus_map/blob/451e3c4fd7e647b240c52986bfe8086632898b09/PhaseTank_v1.0/PhaseTank_v1.0.pl#L553
It now splits by "count:": https://github.com/seb-mueller/chlamy_locus_map/blob/451e3c4fd7e647b240c52986bfe8086632898b09/PhaseTank_v1.0/PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl#L553
This action happens right at the start of the process - it merges libraries before building the bowtie index. NOTE: when it rebuilds the new merged libraries it uses the original "_x" naming convention is used: https://github.com/seb-mueller/chlamy_locus_map/blob/451e3c4fd7e647b240c52986bfe8086632898b09/PhaseTank_v1.0/PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl#L590 This means that there is no need to proliferate the "count:" edit throughout the script as the fasta files we pass it are converted over to their format when the libraries are merged.
I couldn't find the bowtie typo, could you link it?
Really impressed you managed to read and edit perl code! I couldn't find a decription that PhaseTank needs count anywhere, not even in there example: https://github.com/seb-mueller/chlamy_locus_map/blob/451e3c4fd7e647b240c52986bfe8086632898b09/PhaseTank_v1.0/README#L76
Anyway, there is no script to convert fasta into the count format directly. But I found a resonable search string:
ls **/*assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL139/SL139.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL140/SL140.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL141/SL141.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL142/SL142.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL143/SL143.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL144/SL144.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL145/SL145.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL146/SL146.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL14/SL14.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
SL15/SL15.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta.gz
Works running this script:
perl PhaseTank_v1.0_mod.pl --genome /projects/nick_matthews/resources/Creinhardtii_236.fa --lib /projects/nick_matthews/resources/SL140.non_redundant.v_genome_JGI_assembly5_Chlamydomonas_reinhardtii.patman.aligned_reads.fasta
It worked in the end! Results and details are in https://github.com/seb-mueller/chlamy_locus_map/tree/master/Scripts/PhaseTank_OUTPUT_2018.11.27_18.08
Script used is: https://github.com/seb-mueller/chlamy_locus_map/blob/master/Scripts/run_PhaseTank.r
It found 142 phasing cluster, this is the last one: https://github.com/seb-mueller/chlamy_locus_map/blob/9d55776787071653c61eaaabf324509f266268e0/Scripts/PhaseTank_OUTPUT_2018.11.27_18.08/Pred_tab_2018.11.27_18.08#L143
Seems ok to me, could you have another look?
Excellent! Not a huge number of phased locations, but I guess as you said we don't even know if this is significant.
I'll re-run the annotation pipeline as soon as possible including this info, then we can discuss if we want to modify any of the settings based on the density plots.
Need to decide alternative phasing tool. This paper from 2017 compares available tools: https://academic.oup.com/bib/advance-article/doi/10.1093/bib/bbx136/4558649
PhaseTank looks like a good candidate: "PhaseTank [53] implements a slightly different methodology. After defining phased clusters that contain at least fourphased sRNA in 84 nt regions, a nonstatistical phased score is computed to express the chance of a region to be a producer of phased siRNA. This score depends on patterns of sRNA distribution and abundance in the region. The triggering sRNA is then determined following sequence complementarity principles along with the fact that the cleavage site must occur at positions 9–11 nt of the sRNA from its 50 terminal."
I'll look at downloading and creating a script for a test run of PhaseTank.