search

sebanc / brunch

Boot ChromeOS on x86_64 PC - Supports Intel CPU/GPU from 8th gen or AMD Ryzen
GNU General Public License v3.0
3.56k stars 388 forks source link

Ext 4 or ntfs #399

Open CornishRattler opened 4 years ago

CornishRattler commented 4 years ago

Not an issue so delete if not allowed, I currently have W10 and Chrome OS as a dual boot with Chrome being on an ntfs partition on the HDD. My question is would changing this partition to Ext4 have any benefits?

sebanc commented 4 years ago

Even though it seems pretty reliable currently, the ntfs partitions management by the linux kernel is not great so I would recommend ext4. Aside from that, according to benchmarks performed by users, the performance is the same on ext4 or ntfs.

forumi0721 commented 4 months ago

Even though it seems pretty reliable currently, the ntfs partitions management by the linux kernel is not great so I would recommend ext4. Aside from that, according to benchmarks performed by users, the performance is the same on ext4 or ntfs.

Hi, I have a question. I thinks ntfs3 is enough good. (Not ntfs-3g) What is a driver use in Brunch? traditional ntfs? or ntfs-3g? or ntfs3?