Wrong handling of private Identifierers

[jogibear9988]

Try this:

    class aa {
        #aa = true;
    }

We do not create an instance of PrivateIdentifier. We create a normal node with "#" in the value

[lahma]

This should now be covered too.

[adams85]

Unfortunately, not completely. Static private property and method declarations like

class X {
  static #privateField = 'super';
  static #getPrivateField() {
    return X.#privateField;
  }
}

are still parsed incorrectly as Identifiers. (Interestingly, static private getters/setters are handled correctly. Non-static private declarations are ok as well.)

[jogibear9988]

fixed in my pull, missed one parameter