Many of the core Strongtalk library classes are not yet typechecked
sufficiently. Some of this work has been done in the past, but the changes
were lost so it needs to be redone. This will make the typechecker more
useful.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by David.Gr...@gmail.com on 22 Sep 2006 at 9:10
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
David.Gr...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2006 at 9:10