Open sebsauvage opened 11 years ago
Come to think of it, do you recommend using .htaccess (relax, I'm using nginx) or a fully private Shaarli? I've been using the htaccess method to keep up a private shaarli instance and wonder if I'd better use that feature when it comes out.
htacces does the trick, but you are dependant on the webserver: With nginx you're out of luck, and some bad Apache host don't allow the use of htaccess. I'd prefer to see this feature implement in Shaarli itself.
Maybe add a checkbox in Shaarli prefs to make all new links private by default?
Just a little precision, all link are private with no exception ? Or exception are possible ?
Because the difference between https://github.com/sebsauvage/Shaarli/issues/20 on this issue are subtile for me.
This would be an option to mask all links, public or private. (But it would not change the status public/private of each link). This could be useful for those who want to make a fully private shaarli, or temporarly close they shaarli without putting it offline.
Ok thanks for precision.
For a fully private Shaarli, no link would be visible, except if you are logged in.