Closed ratwix closed 4 years ago
Please use the template to report an issue if you want us to provide an answer.
Please use the template to report an issue if you want us to provide an answer.
Fixed
Could you try with the development version of Scapy?
Sorry, I have stop this development.
Le mer. 29 avr. 2020 à 15:29, Guillaume Valadon notifications@github.com a écrit :
Could you try with the development version of Scapy?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/secdev/scapy/issues/2590#issuecomment-621206863, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA42GC6HQ6DA3JYWVVN6QJTRPATUTANCNFSM4MIVTO5Q .
This issue is valid, I confirm it on Python3.7 (vs working Python2 code). What could be done to resolve it?
@alex-kowalczyk You can open a new issue an provide a simple example that exhibits the issue without needing to sniff Wi-Fi frames.
Things to consider Test on Rpi3
Brief description When testing "if packet.haslayer(Dot11)", it return nothing (always false) with Python3 but work with Python2.
How to reproduce
Actual result $ sudo python3 test2.py Start sniffing
Expected result $ sudo python test2.py Start sniffing AP MAC: 24:0a:64:ca:02:0c with SSID: AP MAC: 7a:67:05:de:f9:3c with SSID: AP MAC: 54:60:09:f9:97:26 with SSID:unrudal AP MAC: ac:b5:7d:b6:b3:e7 with SSID: AP MAC: e4:b2:fb:46:aa:66 with SSID:
Related resources Version: 2.4.3 Python: 3.7