secondlife / jira-archive

2 stars 0 forks source link

[BUG-230935] PARCEL_DETAILS_FLAGS and PARCEL_DETAILS_SCRIPT_DANGER for llGetParcelDetails() #8498

Open sl-service-account opened 3 years ago

sl-service-account commented 3 years ago

How would you like the feature to work?

PARCEL_DETAILS_FLAGS: Return the same information as llGetParcelFlags() PARCEL_DETAILS_SCRIPT_DANGER: Return the same information as llScriptDanger()

Destination vector for both functions are already implied by llGetParcelDetails()

Why is this feature important to you? How would it benefit the community?

More information with less function calls.

May have significant future use cases if llGetParcelDetails can ever see beyond a region border (vehicles, pathfinding, etc).

Links

Related

Original Jira Fields | Field | Value | | ------------- | ------------- | | Issue | BUG-230935 | | Summary | PARCEL_DETAILS_FLAGS and PARCEL_DETAILS_SCRIPT_DANGER for llGetParcelDetails() | | Type | New Feature Request | | Priority | Unset | | Status | Accepted | | Resolution | Accepted | | Reporter | NeoBokrug Elytis (neobokrug.elytis) | | Created at | 2021-07-06T19:58:50Z | | Updated at | 2021-07-09T17:04:03Z | ``` { 'Build Id': 'unset', 'Business Unit': ['Platform'], 'Date of First Response': '2021-07-07T13:27:32.471-0500', 'How would you like the feature to work?': 'PARCEL_DETAILS_FLAGS: Return the same information as llGetParcelFlags()\r\nPARCEL_DETAILS_SCRIPT_DANGER: Return the same information as llScriptDanger()\r\n\r\nDestination vector for both functions are already implied by llGetParcelDetails()\r\n', 'ReOpened Count': 0.0, 'Severity': 'Unset', 'Target Viewer Version': 'viewer-development', 'Why is this feature important to you? How would it benefit the community?': 'More information with less function calls.\r\n\r\nMay have significant future use cases if llGetParcelDetails can ever see beyond a region border (vehicles, pathfinding, etc).', } ```
sl-service-account commented 3 years ago

Kyle Linden commented at 2021-07-07T18:27:32Z

Hello, We may implement some version of this request in the future.

Thanks for the suggestion!