Testing the Performance Floater project viewer 6.4.23.562625 (64bit)
What were you doing when it happened?
The new Performance Floater uses labelling inconsistent with the rest of the Viewer (such as within Preferences). Examples:
Graphics Settings:
"Shortcuts" (a meaningless term given the context) in place of "Quality & Speed".
"Visibility Distance" in place of "Draw Distance".
Use of 0-7 in place of labels (Mid, etc), for graphics quality.
Avatars Nearby:
Rounding-down of complexity value & dropping of trailing zeros (so 65 rather than 65,000, for example).
What were you expecting to happen instead?
These are minor niggles, but they present inconsistencies in how options are defined / data is displayed. Would be better if consistency were maintained between this floater and other floaters such as Preferences.
That said, the use of numbers for quality settings is an improvement over the current labelling, and the rounding of Complexity values tidier than the current displays.
Other information
Original Jira Fields
| Field | Value |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Issue | BUG-231174 |
| Summary | [Performance Floater project viewer] - labelling consistency |
| Type | Bug |
| Priority | Unset |
| Status | Accepted |
| Resolution | Triaged |
| Labels | performance_floater |
| Reporter | Inara Pey (inara.pey) |
| Created at | 2021-09-03T20:23:43Z |
| Updated at | 2021-10-20T16:45:11Z |
```
{
'Build Id': 'unset',
'Business Unit': ['Platform'],
'Date of First Response': '2021-09-09T12:08:07.325-0500',
'ReOpened Count': 0.0,
'Severity': 'Unset',
'System': 'SL Viewer',
'Target Viewer Version': 'viewer-development',
'What just happened?': 'Testing the Performance Floater project viewer 6.4.23.562625 (64bit)',
'What were you doing when it happened?': 'The new Performance Floater uses labelling inconsistent with the rest of the Viewer (such as within Preferences). Examples:\r\n\r\nGraphics Settings: \r\n- "Shortcuts" (a meaningless term given the context) in place of "Quality & Speed".\r\n- "Visibility Distance" in place of "Draw Distance".\r\n- Use of 0-7 in place of labels (Mid, etc), for graphics quality.\r\n\r\nAvatars Nearby:\r\n- Rounding-down of complexity value & dropping of trailing zeros (so 65 rather than 65,000, for example). ',
'What were you expecting to happen instead?': 'These are minor niggles, but they present inconsistencies in how options are defined / data is displayed. Would be better if consistency were maintained between this floater and other floaters such as Preferences. \r\n\r\nThat said, the use of numbers for quality settings is an improvement over the current labelling, and the rounding of Complexity values tidier than the current displays. ',
}
```
What just happened?
Testing the Performance Floater project viewer 6.4.23.562625 (64bit)
What were you doing when it happened?
The new Performance Floater uses labelling inconsistent with the rest of the Viewer (such as within Preferences). Examples:
Graphics Settings:
Use of 0-7 in place of labels (Mid, etc), for graphics quality.
Avatars Nearby:
What were you expecting to happen instead?
These are minor niggles, but they present inconsistencies in how options are defined / data is displayed. Would be better if consistency were maintained between this floater and other floaters such as Preferences.
That said, the use of numbers for quality settings is an improvement over the current labelling, and the rounding of Complexity values tidier than the current displays.
Other information
Original Jira Fields
| Field | Value | | ------------- | ------------- | | Issue | BUG-231174 | | Summary | [Performance Floater project viewer] - labelling consistency | | Type | Bug | | Priority | Unset | | Status | Accepted | | Resolution | Triaged | | Labels | performance_floater | | Reporter | Inara Pey (inara.pey) | | Created at | 2021-09-03T20:23:43Z | | Updated at | 2021-10-20T16:45:11Z | ``` { 'Build Id': 'unset', 'Business Unit': ['Platform'], 'Date of First Response': '2021-09-09T12:08:07.325-0500', 'ReOpened Count': 0.0, 'Severity': 'Unset', 'System': 'SL Viewer', 'Target Viewer Version': 'viewer-development', 'What just happened?': 'Testing the Performance Floater project viewer 6.4.23.562625 (64bit)', 'What were you doing when it happened?': 'The new Performance Floater uses labelling inconsistent with the rest of the Viewer (such as within Preferences). Examples:\r\n\r\nGraphics Settings: \r\n- "Shortcuts" (a meaningless term given the context) in place of "Quality & Speed".\r\n- "Visibility Distance" in place of "Draw Distance".\r\n- Use of 0-7 in place of labels (Mid, etc), for graphics quality.\r\n\r\nAvatars Nearby:\r\n- Rounding-down of complexity value & dropping of trailing zeros (so 65 rather than 65,000, for example). ', 'What were you expecting to happen instead?': 'These are minor niggles, but they present inconsistencies in how options are defined / data is displayed. Would be better if consistency were maintained between this floater and other floaters such as Preferences. \r\n\r\nThat said, the use of numbers for quality settings is an improvement over the current labelling, and the rounding of Complexity values tidier than the current displays. ', } ```