Closed Weltraumschaf closed 5 years ago
Hi Sven 👋 Thanks for the report. I'm guessing the difference is because the amass version used in the securecodebox image is slightly out of date. It's nice to see that they have apparently been able to improve their results even more 👍 I'll try to update the used version soon.
Updated to the latest amass version, went pretty smoothly apparently no api changes.
I ran a scan against your domain and the result looked same as the expected result you posted.
I'm hoping to get a release with the update out later today.
When I run the scanner from secureCodeBox (master) against my own domain I got the result:
In contrast from the latest amass on CLI I got a more accurate result (w/o this "2f" or "2b-" artifacts):