Open tlongers opened 3 years ago
I actually like having the placeholder "source" in the list - I think it helps hammer home that this is a unit that we've created to have the hierarchy represented. I say keep it :)
Should we improve the message so it makes more sense as a "Title"? Something like:
"Placeholder source: The datapoint to which this source is applied is a placeholder. This means that it represents a link in the hierarchical structure of this branch of the security or defence force for which Security Force Monitor does not have a direct source but research shows is likely to exist."
In two scenarios, we create "placeholder" units:
Here, for example:
We handle sourcing for these units using a dummy source (access point ID:
f93f5cb7-0e67-4b70-863f-c91c783988c3
):There are a couple of other dummy sources too, which handle different cases.
I don't think these needs to appear in the "sources" table for each record. @tonysecurityforcemonitor - what's your take on this?