Closed kolingv closed 4 years ago
The recall is probably quite low as you just predict for 1000 images. You actually truncate the evaluation summary so we can't see it.
To get the score from these 1000 images you have to remove boxes not from these images in the ground-truth.
Many thanks!! Both the AP and recall are low. And i check coco evaluation codes from ‘keras-mask-rcnn', it did remove the gound truth. I'll give a try if possilbe. Whole coco results:
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.076
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.112
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.080
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.036
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.083
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.113
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 1 ] = 0.060
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 10 ] = 0.092
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.096
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.049
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.105
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.136
Refer to keras_center/bin/ctdet_coco.py (line 58), I have made the following change to randomly pick only 1000 samples :
bash command:
After evaluation,
which is quite low compare to the all-image evaluation, AP = 0.364
As I have done this to mask-rcnn keras, the max accuracy drop is around 2%. Here, the result dropps too much!!! Can someone explain anything wrong with the change? BTW: I have tried more samples, it seems the more images, the AP higher