Front page under "note on view syntax" it says
The lack of resemblance to HTML be offputting,
I think this should read
The lack of resemblance to HTML may be offputting,
Also the "why add another?" section
it uses Rust builtin types, with thinly-wrapped by macros
makes more sense without the "with"
it uses Rust builtin types, thinly wrapped by macros
Front page under "note on view syntax" it says
The lack of resemblance to HTML be offputting,I think this should readThe lack of resemblance to HTML may be offputting,Also the "why add another?" sectionit uses Rust builtin types, with thinly-wrapped by macrosmakes more sense without the "with"it uses Rust builtin types, thinly wrapped by macrosYasmi(chat,documentationchannel)