DOI compatibility

[zagorGit]

Minted DOIs for data files/documents, assays/studies/investigations not recognized by datacite.org nor crossref.org nor identifiers.org.... Any possibility to make them "detectable"?

[alaninmcr]

Do you have an example of an object where the DOI is not recognized?

Also which instance of SEEK is it on?

[zagorGit]

DOI minted under project 161 at fairdomhub.org (seek v.1.9.1) e.g. 10.15490/fairdomhub.1.datafile.3116.1 10.15490/fairdomhub.1.datafile.3119.1 http://doi.org/10.15490/FAIRDOMHUB.1.STUDY.670.1

[zagorGit]

Update:

FAIRDOMHUb is listed by FAIRsharing and re3data.org. However it is not listed by Springer Nature and it cannot mint ''DataCite DOIs'' (DOI compatible with DataCite Metadata Schema 4.3). It is stated that ''Repository managers to investigate listing repositories with re3data.org in the first instance and, for those that meet the criteria, applying for listing with Scientific Data'' [https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/faqs/12327154]. Therefore, it would be appreciated if FAIRDOMHub/seek repository managers could applying for listing with Scientific Data so that FAIRDOMHub minted DOIs' become recognizable by DOI Registration Agencies.

Thank you and kind regards

[fbacall]

What do you mean by "recognized" exactly?

We are using DataCite to provide our DOIs, so they should recognize them at least.

$ curl -LH "Accept: application/vnd.datacite.datacite+xml" https://doi.org/10.15490/fairdomhub.1.datafile.3116.1
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.15490/FAIRDOMHUB.1.DATAFILE.3116.1</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName nameType="Personal">Zagorscak, Maja</creatorName>
      <givenName>Maja</givenName>
      <familyName>Zagorscak</familyName>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title xml:lang="en-gb">/reports/Merged.aa.html</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>FAIRDOMHub</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2019</publicationYear>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Other">CreativeWork</resourceType>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2019</date>
  </dates>
  <version/>
  <descriptions>
    <description xml:lang="en-gb" descriptionType="Abstract">Supplementary HTML 1 Multiple sequence alignments using MAFFT v7.271 and MView v1.65. Paralogue cluster on representative and alternative sequences, at least one from each of the four genotypes. Clusters containing 8-16 sequences.</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>

There is a bug, however with the resourceType and resourceTypeGeneral not being set properly, so they appear as "Other". Maybe this is the problem?

[fbacall]

Did not intend to close...

[zagorGit]

Update with e.g. on https://fairdomhub.org/data_files/3116?version=1

It seems one can query dx.doi.org with 10.5281/zenodo.3552846 (DOI 'badge' on zenodo.org or github.com page) or 10.15490/fairdomhub.1.datafile.3116.1 (shown as DOI value/item at fairdomhub.org) or http://doi.org/10.15490/FAIRDOMHUB.1.DATAFILE.3116.1 (shown as Citation at fairdomhub.org; even add fairdomhub printed out dois' as alternate identifiers in zenodo.org; however https://search.datacite.org/ (browser) recognizes exclusively following format: doi:10.5281/ZENODO.3552846 doi:10.15490/FAIRDOMHUB.1.DATAFILE.3091.1 https://search.datacite.org/ui?&q , one used for DataCite Metadata search, does not recognize either (therefore it was suggested "We recommend consulting with FAIRDOMHub to ensure your DOIs are registered at DataCite. You can also read more about the use of DataCite DOIs for data repositories on our submission guidelines page at https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories")

• Maybe information provided at fairdomhub.org regarding doi could be reformatted to prevent potential future obstacles regarding recognition?
• It would till be useful to list the FAIRDOMHub as repository with Springer Nature to facilitate data hosting at it and reporting it in SN journals

[mfenner]

@zagorGit https://search.datacite.org/ui is an old, deprecated search interface that will be retired by the end of the year.

dx.doi.org has been deprecated in favor of doi.org.

DataCite content negotiation is documented at https://support.datacite.org/docs/datacite-content-resolver.

Searching for specific DOIs in DataCite Search should be improved and is something DataCite will be working on.

[zagorGit]

Thank you for the information. As i understand, https://citation.crosscite.org/followed by curl -LH "Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, application/rdf+xml" http://doi.org/... is the way to prove how FAIRDOMHub DOIs are registered at DataCite, for now.

[mfenner]

Not really. https://citation.crosscite.org/ is for formatting citations. Please don't use content negotiation to check the existence of a DOI. If you want to know whether a DOI exists, and is registered with DataCite, you can use https://doi.org/ra/10.15490/fairdomhub.1.datafile.3116.1. This API call will return either

[
  {
    "DOI": "10.15490/fairdomhub.1.datafile.3116.1",
    "RA": "DataCite"
  }
]

or

[
  {
    "DOI": "10.15490/fairdomhub.1.datafile.XXX",
    "status": "DOI does not exist"
  }
]

[zagorGit]

The original issue started with: ...We also cannot confirm that the DOIs have been registered with DataCite and recommend that you either query this with DataCite .... Although the DOI resolve, they do not appear in DataCite.... I'm not sure this will be enough.

[alaninmcr]

Michael O'Donohue has raise the issue of DOIs and mapping to the DataCite schema (now at version 4.4). It would be a good thing if it was checked.,