Closed seewoo5 closed 1 month ago
Maybe not important, but we can try to replace hineq: q * r + r * p + p * r \leq p * q * r in flt_catalan with the original form of the assumption 1/p + 1/q + 1/r \leq 1 as in the note.
hineq: q * r + r * p + p * r \leq p * q * r
flt_catalan
1/p + 1/q + 1/r \leq 1
I think people will prefer to work mostly in Nat (no change). But we can ask their opinion on it.
Nat
Maybe not important, but we can try to replace
hineq: q * r + r * p + p * r \leq p * q * r
inflt_catalan
with the original form of the assumption1/p + 1/q + 1/r \leq 1
as in the note.