Closed lmarburger closed 1 year ago
Is there any plans to merge this at some point?
Can i help with contributions?
We're going to be merging #387 and #393 soon and then I'll come back to this PR and clean it up. #393 is especially important because it allows us to correctly interpret the Parquet timestamp units to build the appropriate time.Time
.
I believe this change is blocked on #365. I don't think logical type information is being written to the parquet column information which causes times to be deserializable only as int64
. I'm looking into it.
Serialize
time.Time
values as Parquet timestamps. The default unit isNANOS
and can be changed using thetimestamp()
struct tag.Resolves #266