Closed fraga closed 11 years ago
That's all I could do guys, that's all I know =)
Let me know what you think, I still have 1 failing test:
Failures:
1) Navigating on order views and editing one result
Failure/Error: expect(page).to have_content "21/01/2033"
expected there to be text "21/01/2033" in "Olá, Name_4 (Sair) Início Servicos Novo Listar Serviço Listar Item Clientes Novo Listar Cliente Listar Veículo Resumo Geral Financeiro × Serviço atualizado(a) com sucesso. Todos os Serviços Buscar Criar Serviço Id Data Total Status 001 2013-01-21 false Editar Remover © Cleaners 2013"
# ./spec/features/order_spec.rb:41:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
Finished in 2.39 seconds
5 examples, 1 failure
Failed examples:
rspec ./spec/features/order_spec.rb:32 # Navigating on order views and editing one result
Oops, two failing tests:
Failures:
1) Order when receiving nil params as #vehicle
Failure/Error: expect(order).not_to be_valid
expected #<Order id: nil, order_date: "-4712-01-01 00:00:00", closed: false, value: #<BigDecimal:7ffda363b8e0,'0.5E2',9(45)>, vehicle_id: 5, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil> not to be valid
# ./spec/models/order_spec.rb:26:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
2) Navigating on order views and editing one result
Failure/Error: expect(page).to have_content "21/01/2033"
expected there to be text "21/01/2033" in "Olá, Name_116 (Sair) Início Servicos Novo Listar Serviço Listar Item Clientes Novo Listar Cliente Listar Veículo Resumo Geral Financeiro × Serviço atualizado(a) com sucesso. Todos os Serviços Buscar Criar Serviço Id Data Total Status 001 2013-01-21 false Editar Remover © Cleaners 2013"
# ./spec/features/order_spec.rb:41:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
Finished in 11.82 seconds
73 examples, 2 failures
Wow! That's nice @fraga. By the way, I made some comments. :wink:
Reverting this commit gives me 5 failing tests now
That's it. :laughing: Fix it and commit again.
I'm not sure how to fix this now, inverting the relation as you told me?
@fraga, sorry by delay. I think this is the best way to see the logical business as it is, having the relationship as I mentioned.
I'm missing something or this PR is merging in the wrong place? @fraga is committing in orders-crud
branch? Is this correct? Should not be the master
branch?
It's ok @fabianoalmeida, we didn't want to commit broken tests in master
Great! Thanks.
Continuing evaluating the relation on the orders and vehicle