search

seltmann / allArthropodDataProject

An analysis of all arthropod collections data
0 stars 1 forks source link

Data? #7

Open seltmann opened 9 years ago

seltmann commented 9 years ago

MCZ has 300k arthropod records in iDigBio separate from the SCAN set. We only have 45k and so there will be at least 250k from iDigBio that we will need. I know there are some ant records that are redundant in the MCZ data sets in iDigbio but my guess is that it might just be a few thousand. I do not know how many they have at GBIF.

Look for redundant data GBIF and iDigBio.

seltmann commented 9 years ago

All Data Providers and datasets available through USGS BISON are listed here: http://bison.usgs.ornl.gov/#providers
Includes the following datasets that might be of interest: (Sam Droege's database) USGS PWRC (Patuxent Wildlife Research Center) Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab - US, Canada, and Mexico (260,950 records) USDA-ARS Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory:

Numerous other University collections that participate in/publish data for GBIF harvest e.g. Illinois Natural History Survey (462,242) records.

USDA PLANTS database (2,390,439 records) *the BISON copy is more up to date than the version available from GBIF.

Numerous other plant species occurrence datasets available through GBIF.

seltmann commented 9 years ago

are records in InvertEBase in our database? compare GBIF with InvertEBase, check GBIF download.

seltmann commented 9 years ago

INHS GBIF and iDigBio, same datasets or different.

seltmann commented 9 years ago

Riverside data, redundant data or not? Berkley compare with whats on GBIF

seltmann commented 9 years ago

http://entmuseum4.ucr.edu/~douglasyanega/UCRDL.txt Riverside